"Can you really afford another 2 yrs of democrats?"

I read the title only of an inflammatory article in the msn.com 'news' [Public relations page/propaganda for Planned Parenthood-Democratic Party sponsored by Microsoft and NBC] that asked the pretend question of if you could afford to have a second child. If you do not see the blatant screaming against life intent of that article then you are brainwashed to the max! And should go to a desert island for about 7 years far from the madding crowds and clear your mind.

That article TITLE made me so mad I decided I would write in my blog about it. HOW DARE they write such evil? The US is depopulating! The United States will become the United States of the Saudi Emirates and or the Iranians and or the Latinos from South America if those blockheads from Washington DC have their way.

Do not ever ever ever ever vote democrat. Those people are from hell.

Their agenda for the nation is killing off the unborn children in massive slaughters reminiscent of the days of Herod in the Bible. The current administration should be tried for treason against the nation NOT reelected to any thing. Treason because depopulation destroys the nation.

Vote prolife and that means do not vote democrat. There is no such policy as prolife in the democratic socialist party of the US which is in control of the current US Congress. Read what the democrats stand for: the 'choice' to kill human babies whent they are tiniest in the womb, and chop them, shred them, dice them, make a 'jam' of their cells and smear them on agar plates to study under a microscope to get billions from the wicked in high places. A better idea is to kick out the wicked from high places from office and begin by voting these listed from office :
Arlen Specter in Pennsylvania
Barbara Boxer in California
Obama from White House
H Clinton from any position
Robin Carnahan from Missouri
Charles Schumer from NY
Charles Lewis from GA
Nancy Pelosi from California
These names are some of the most RADICAl against human life that has ever been in any elected position since Hitler held office in Germany. Vote them out of office!
Gloria Poole,RN; Missouri; 11:54AM; 29-Oct-2010

Voter Information to help you vote Prolife

The National Prolife Alliance sent me information today that is very relevant to this
upcoming election for all elections across the nation. They regularly conduct a survey
asking wannabe candidates for office for their responses to a set of questions. For the
public record, these are the questions:
1) Will you support federal legislation giving parents the right to stop any abortion
being performed on their minor daughter except to prevent the death of the mother?
2) Will you support requiring a 48 hour cooling off period and mandatory counseling on
the risks and consequences of abortion for persons who believe that they may want to
have an abortion? [This common sense informed consent is required for virtually every
other form of invasive procedure that is not an emergency life-saving event.]
3) Will you support federl legislation giving spouses the right to be notified and
intervene before any abortion is performed on the couple's baby?
4) Will you support legislation to outlaw so-called 'sex selection' abortions?
5) Would you vote to prohibit the US government from granting any public funds to
groups that recommend or perform abortions in the United States or abroad?
6) Should the federal government bar the distribution of 'home abortion drugs" like
RU-486?
7) Will you support nominees to the United States Supreme Court and the lower federal
courts who will uphold the constitutional right to life of every person born and unborn?
8) Will you support legislation which under Article III, Section 2 of the United States
Constitution would remove from the federal courts jurisdiction over the question of
abortion?
9) Would you support and cosponsor a Life at Conception Act defining that life begins
at the moment of conception [fertilization when human male sperm enters human female
egg], thereby resolving for all time, as stated by the Supreme Court in Roe v Wade,
'the difficult question of when life begins"? {It is not medically difficult since it
was detemined medically when that event happens decades ago.]
10). Will you support an Amendment to the US Constitution banning abortion except
to prevent death of the mother?

In the case of Missouri, Robin Carnahan refused to answer any of these questions.
And Hon Roy Blunt answered YES to all ten questions.

Ask your state candidates how they answered this questionaire and ask your newspaper
to publish their answers. It matters. Human life has to matter as much to this planet
as the environment and as the seals and the frogs and the insects. Remember that it is
written, "so GOD created man in HIS own image; in the image of GOD created HE him;
male and female created HE them; and GOD blessed them, and GOD said unto them: be
fruitful and multiply and replenish the earth,and subdue it and have dominion over
the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air and over every living thing that
moveth upon the earth." Genesis 1:27-28,King James Holy Bible.
Gloria Poole,RN; at home in Missouri; 4:35PM;13-Oct-2010

How to avoid breast cancer--its not wearing pink

I read the usual annual marketing ploy of wearing pink and donating money to fake ngos collecting money that goes to planned parenthood [ do your homework]. I want to tell you women how to really avoid breast cancer, and it is simple.Do what GOD intended with your female bodies and that is have living babies and feed them naturally. In other words produce living babies and breast feed them. And do not use artificial estrogen or progesterone replacement so-called therapies that are powerful steroids used the wrong way at the wrong time and from wrong sources. Your own body produces those steroids when they are needed to produce new human beings and that is the proper time for those steroids, and not when you are post-menopausal.
And of course do not smoke or use any form of tobacco.
That is much hype in the news but much of it is a fund-raising hype to get people to run for money to support causes that have nothing to do with curing breast cancer. If there was a cure for it, it would be suppressed from the public because then the NIH would go out of business and those phony scientists would be unemployed and unemployable. They feed off the misery off those with cancer.
I believe that cancer is a form of the body literally digesting itself by the rapid multiplication of cells of that were thwarted in some way from doing what they were intended to do and went rogue, wild. And I think that if there is to be a real cure it will begin with recognizing that cancer begins within a human body not from outside it. JESUS said it is not what goes into a man's mouth that defiles him but what comes out of it. The thoughts and spirit of man that are defiled are the starting points of cancer, I believe. But I also believe it has a physical turning point in the body when the cells intended to produce living human babies such as in a pregnancy aborted that run rampant and keep on producing and multiplying that produce tumors instead of living babies when the baby was killed by the mother when the baby was in the womb. And perhaps in men for example prostate cancer in men when the sperm is blocked as in vasectomies and the sperm is absorbed by the men into his bloodstream instead of producing new humans as GOD intended.
Gloria Poole, RN,; at home in Missouri; 7:01PM;7-Oct-2010

I Agree w/ Montana GOP:no homosexuality

I read an article this am about the Montana GOP having a platform that homosexuality should be illegal. And it asked if anyone agreed with that policy. I want to go on record as writing that I AGREE that homosexuality should be illegal in all nations and in all cities, and in all ordinances and that it should be enforced. I believe this because of the written Scriptures in Leviticus 18:22 and 20:13, and Romans chapter one in the King James Holy Bible. And also because when any behaviour is so-called legal which is a much lower standard than JESUS applied, it is taught in public schools as a so-called 'right'. If you are a true born again believer you could not accept as truth or public law any act/deed that defiles the Word of GOD or that is in direct opposition to the word of GOD. Lukewarm christians have the word from JESUS in Revelation that HE will spue them out of HIS mouth.

And because true born again believers must strive to please GOD and not humans, you must also not allow abortion to be a so-called right in your household or life. It is also abomination as are homosexuals. The commandments of GOD in Exodus chapter 20 are very clear on this topic. If you don't know the commandments you should learn them. Being ignorant of them will not absolve you of responsibility for them on GOD's Judgement day when the wicked are sent to hell.

The prohibition against killing [Exodus 20:13,KJV] also includes not killing the innocent tiny human embryoes for any reason but especially at government orders [NIH] and paid for by taxpayers and for the reason of benefitting the Old Folks Home of Congress like N Pelosi, and Biden, and Clintons, and the majority there who are over 70 yrs old and who have voted to kill innocents for 40 yrs, in order to get government grant money and kickbacks from Planned Parenthood and 'dividends' from abortuaries [the gas ovens of 21st century]..
Also read Revelation to see what events will happen on GOD's judgement day when the physical world ends, when JESUS comes back to the earth, to gather to heaven the righteous believers and to send to hell those who reject GOD.

Gloria Poole;at my apt in Missouri; 1:10PM;18-Sept-2010

Judge Lamberth hold fast to stopping slaughter of innocents.

I am absolutely opposed to the so-called research on human embryoes that were forcefully removed from the womb by assassins and chopped into pieces and then smashed/ground up like hamburger to smear their cells on agar plates. It is cannabalism, it is inhumane and it is disgusting. I am sure that those who kill with premeditation and deliberate intent will go to hell and I say the sooner the better for the human race.
And I am glad, very glad that Judge Lamberth has knowledge of the true laws and I am glad he is bold enough to make the fake scientists retreat and stop the slaughter of innocents. And I am praying that GOD HIMSELF emboldens him and holds him up to withstand the onslaught by the wicked and the ngos that kill for money.
And I think as a Registered Nurse of many years, that if any person would swallow any drug made from killed humans that they deserve hell too.
And here are opinions of other Christians:
",,, the ruling [by Judge Lamberth that embryonic stem cell research violates the public law ] drew praise from the Alliance Defense Fund, a group of Christian attorneys who helped with the lawsuit filed by two researchers against the administration rules.

"The American people should not be forced to pay for experiments — prohibited by federal law — that destroy human life," said Steven H. Aden, the group's senior legal counsel. "The court is simply enforcing an existing law passed by Congress that prevents Americans from paying another penny for needless research on human embryos."

Also, I ask you to research the Nuremberg Code of International law regarding research on humans, that was accepted by all nations [as far as I know] after the trials that brought the killers of the Nazi regime to justice. And ask yourself these questions in regard to those laws:
1) how could a tiny, defenseless human in the womb or removed from it by force [abortions where they get all the human pieces to 'extract' DNA from], give informed consent to be slaughtered?
2) How could a tiny defenseless human in the womb or removed from it by force, do what is necessary to halt destructive 'research' on the self?
3) How could a tiny, defenseless human in the womb or removed from it by force [abortions where they get all the human pieces to 'extract' DNA from], raise their hands against the assassins of abortionists and so-called [but phony] scientists who kill for the millions they get in federal research money?
4) How could a tiny defenseless human in them womb or removed from it by force,[via abortions where they get all the human pieces to 'extract' DNA from] lobby
in Congress to stop the premeditated slaughter by the millions of the class of humans known collectively as embryoes and fetuses?
And then remind yourself it is UP TO YOU to stand in the gap, to make your protest loud and clear, to fight against those who are determined to destroy the human race from off the planet and those who think that animals should inherit the earth and humans be destroyed! IT IS UP TO YOU to make a difference.
Gloria Poole,RN licensed in Colorado but living in Missouri; 7:45AM, 25-Aug-2010; at my aprt in Missouri;
Updated on 5-Sept-2010 at my apt in Missouri to re-add this info:
https://sites.google.com/site/newsforlife/humans-in-womb-photos/
has medical photos of tiny humans in amniotic sacs [bag of waters as it is commonly called.]
Also see:
http://www.sites.google.com/site/lifetv
https://www.sites.google.com/site/wordslife
http://overturn-roe.com
http://real-women-have-babies.com
Update on 8-Sept-2010 at 5:08 PM with the news that the evil Obama administration is
trying to force the destruction of human embryoes by filing an appeal after Judge Lamberth refused to allow funding of destruction of human embryoes. The case info is:
"The case is Sherley v. Sebelius, 09-cv-1575, U.S. District Court,
District of Columbia, and 10-5287,
U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia (Washington)."
The Obama administration filed an appeal to try to force the destruction of
human embryoes in the fake name of research.Obama does not think of himself as President but as a false god apparently. He is a false god because there is only one GOD and it is not him, and THE GOD wrote in stone, "thou shalt not kill' and that is recorded in Exodus 20:13. Remember how stubborn Pharoah
was when the Jews were in Egypt?
Obama has to be defeated.
5:02 PM 9/8/2010

About the Muslim Entertainment ctr planned for 9/11 lots

I have purposely not written on this topic before because I wanted time to think it through but I have read up on it some and thought on it for days now and here are my thoughts on it [the Park51 Muslim entertainment center 2 blocks from Twin Towers take-down].
1) It is the equivalent of bombing a place and then planting a victory flag over it.
2) It is not about religious freedom since it is not a mosque to pray in but a place to party in.
3) It is not a coincidence at all but a carefully planned manuever to rub the noses of all America in the victory of the muslims who destroyed the twin towers. And it was a victory because the men who destroyed it were not in any way brought to justice and they are considered martyrs [the ones who died]. The nation that those men were from [Saudi Arabia] is still considered essential to America's 'success' since they hold the purse strings to the oil that America wants so much.
And my deciding to post this is directly in response to this quote from the Canada Press today at http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/26762. I
quote:
"Despite the plentiful amount of information developed by independent
researchers, bloggers, and commentators that
has been published about the questionable associations of project front
man ABDUL-RAUF over the last few weeks, he continues to travel to the
Middle East as an emissary of America at the behest of the
Obama/Clinton State Department. Ostensibly, his purpose is to
“discuss Muslim life in America and religious tolerance” with
Islamic leaders in Muslim countries. Despite his questionable
associations, the U.S. State Department is steadfast in their
support of his goodwill tour.
U.S. State Department invoking an unprecedented shroud of secrecy

Not only is the U.S. State Department unwavering in their support
in spite of such controversy, they are invoking an unprecedented
shroud of secrecy over the trip."
Read entire article "Report of Investigation Park 51" written
by Doug Hagmann Saturday, August 21, 2010
in the Canada Press today:8:07 AM 8/22/2010
Anything Obama-Clintons are involved in is evil as their hearts are evil
and they have destroyed millions of innocents in the womb in the US and abroad.
And I am fully convinced that the reason the Chelsea wedding was
so secreted away was because the enemies of America as perceived by
most Americans and as defined by the US Constitution as intending to
destroy the U.S. were at that wedding schmoozing with the Clintons
to undermine America.
Gloria Poole; 8:20AM,22-Aug-2010; at my apt in Missouri

Never get an Olympus digital camera-allows theft ur photos

I was given an Olympus camera as a gift for Christmas of 2008. But I did not know it had a back door to criminals as part of the camera. Every time I transfer my original photos from my camera to my PC, photos are stolen by criminals at a remote location who are not authorized on any thing of mine, and not authorized to log in to my computer from anywhere. Today an entire album was stolen from my PC as I was transferring them from the 'storage' portion of the camera to my PC. This is a public notice/warning that most of the originals are still on my camera and are also on my repository site at http://gloriapoole.com/photography/. So if you try to sell them, you will be caught and prosecuted.
Gloria Poole; at my aprt in Missouri; 8:54PM,16-Aug-2010;
Updated next am after realizing that I should have added more about this:
my sketches I sketch are also on my repository sites
and the main one is http://gloriapoole.com/my-sketches/
and my pen/inks, pencil drawings are on my repository site at:
http://gloriapoole.com/drawings/
and my paintings I paint are on several sites of mine but my main repository site is:
http://gloriapoole.com/paintings/
and on other repository sites and websites, and blogs also with a list of some of them on my main site at http://gloriapoole.com and also on my name site at http://gloriapoole.name.
And my grown daughters {Jennifer and Leigh] and their families' photos are stored in other places also.
And I have the original sketches, drawings and paintings I created, and I have my photos backed up to a physical disc in my possession in secure place. The point is, I could prove that the photos represent my own photographing and my own family and my own originals I create. So stealing them will not help you and it would probably land you in a prison for cybercrime, theft of children's photos, theft of intellectual properties, theft of photos of my 'career' as such as an artist's body of work spanning decades,theft of identities.
And I called the FBI,and submitted a written complaint to them, just so you know. I am not devious.
Gloria Poole,at my aprt in Missouri, 7:13AM, 17-Aug-2010
Update again with more info since the photos involve my flesh and blood daughters [Jennifer and Leigh] and their families and also my photography websites' integrity.
You may see documentation of my photography on my main site at http://gloriapoole.com. And you may see the actual photos at these sites that are specific genre sorted photos:

http://gloriapoole.com/questionable-sky-object-photo
http://gloriapoole.com/sunset-studies
http://gloriapoole.com/Rocky_Mtns
http://gloriapoole.com/storm-studies
http://gloriapoole.com/juxtaposition
http://picasaweb.google.com/gloria0817
http://gloriapoole-RN.com
http://gloriapoole.com/churches
http://gloriapoole.com/flower-photos
http://gloriapoole.com/spaceship-photographed-maybe
http://gloriapoole.com/travel-photos
and I have also added them to some of my spaces blogs including:
http://gloria-poole.spaces.live.com
http://gloria0817.spaces.live.com
http://purple-glo.spaces.live.com
and maybe other sites/blogs also.
This is well-known about me and I began photographing when I worked as a stringer for the St Simons Island Georgia Newspaper.Then I continued it as a hobby, and to paint from the photos but thought the public might enjoy seeing them also. But I own the photographs and my paintings, sketches, drawings, and my images of me and I own the copyrights to them also. It is also well known about me that I paint as an artist in oils, acrylics, watercolors, tempera,goauche, powdered pastels,and create sketches with pen/inks, pencils, charcoals, oil pastels. I have also created a few computer-generated graphics on my computer and they are on another website of mine at: http://gloriapoole.me.uk/clip-art. They are quite different from the paintings, sketches, and drawings that I do by hand, as you will see if you compare the sites.
It is also well-known about me that I am a registered nurse for as many years as I am an artist. Actually I began the art work before nursing because I took mechanical drawing in high school years ago.
This is not about vanity or ego but about protecting the integrity of my name and my created works that belong to me and that I own the copyright of, and that were created by me for me [the photos on my websites/blogs were not ever as any sort of paid work for anyone but belong to me exclusively.] I like sharing my created works but that is not permission to steal them. Copyrighted intellectual properties have legal protection around the world. FYI.
Gloria Poole; at my apt in Missouri; 8:38AM, 17-Aug-2010

Thank GOD for good Judge Henry Hudson of VA

Today I read this article written by Betsy McCaughey in the Wall St Journal :
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703545604575407160833226350.html/
about the lawsuit filed by the State of Virginia against the ObamaCare usurpation of authority of the true written law of the U S and that is the Constitution.
I quote from that article:
"Judge Hudson ruled that the court must do what Congress failed to do—apply the Constitution." And again:
"On Monday, U.S. District Judge Henry Hudson got serious. He denied Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius's motion to dismiss a lawsuit brought by the state of Virginia challenging the new health law. His ruling stated that it is far from certain Congress has the authority to compel Americans to buy insurance and penalize those who don't. " [end quote]
This ruling means the case of the state of Virginia will move forward possibly and probably to the Supreme Court, to decide the issue of whether there is any Constitutional authority for Congress to force citizens to buy anything. [There is not --it would require a Constitutional Amendment and that ObamaFakeCare bill did not amend the Constitution and was not ratified by the people themselves which is what is required to amend the Constitution. Read the Constitution!
The Constitution is not similar to that phony bill of Obama-Pelosi-Clinton socialists in the fact that it is about 10 pages long and the fake reform bill [it was intended to reform the type of government the US has from a republic to a socialist nation] is about 2300 pages give or take a few pages [last news report of it]. The provisions of it were not made public until after it was voted on, and there was a whole lot of arm-twisting, deal-making, corruption, bought votes going on to get it to Obama's desk for his signature.
I am so glad there is a US District Court Judge in Virginia that knows the Constitution. What a miracle for the nation. PRAY he has the wisdom of GOD to do what is right for this nation and not what is right for the wicked in power in Congress who were only serving themselves when they wrote that bill and strong-armed it into public law. I pray every lawsuit against the Socialist rewrite of the nation goes forward and that the Constitution prevails and that is protects the citizens and not the dividends from abortuaries and 'investments' into killing innocents of career politicians.
Also the good state of Missouri voted against ObamaCare.
See article at http://www.columbiatribune.com/news/2010/aug/03/ap-voters-reject-key-provision-health-care-law/
I quote from that article:
"Missouri voters on Tuesday overwhelmingly rejected a key provision
of President Barack Obama's health care law.." and also
"Missouri's law prohibits the government from requiring people to have
health insurance or from penalizing them from paying for their own
health care. That would conflict with a federal requirement that
most people have health insurance or face penalties starting in 2014."
To change topic but on the topic of Judges and I think Kagan would be a horrible Judge--ruinous to the nation.
And about Kagan, just vote NO to her. She is bad for the nation for these reasons:
1) she is against the tiniest most defenseless humans in the womb;
2) she wrote the policy that upheld that evil of infanticide euphemistically labeled by her as 'partial birth abortion' killing for a long time and she was the legal defense of that ungodly B Clinton including probably for his sexual harassment case involving Monica Lewinsky. That should have caused him to be removed from office but she wheeled and dealed to try to cover his crimes.
3) She is against the second amendment of the Constitution that allows citizens to own guns and protect themselves from invasion by unauthorized agents of governments invading one's home place and or from criminals breaking into one's home. The NRA also vehemently opposes her for that reason.
4) She is a cohort of Obama aka Berry --enough said about that. His activities speak for his belief systems or lack of.
5) She is in the pocket --the puppet of Planned Parenthood and Center for Reproductive [killing] evil so-called 'rights."
6) Her agenda for the nation is ruinous.
Gloria Poole; at my home in Missouri; 7:22 AM, 3-Aug-2010
Update at 9:05AM after reading more of the news and discovering that there is not anything in the NY Times about the decision by Judge Henry Hudson to allow the challenge to Obama to go forward. It is not a real surprise to me however since the NY Times is very much controlled by The District of Columbia [Washington DC] politics and gerry-mandering ,and election rigging,and vote buying.
Also to add this because it is a very ominous sign of the way the current administration is headed and trying to do that secretly since this is from the BBC News and not from any newspaper in the USA:
There is a particularly troubling bit of news in the BBC today about
whether the US government has the authority to put a US citizen's name
on a list to 'capture or kill' without due process for the person so
accused. It seems the citizen is accused of crimes and I am not excusing that
but there is a process to follow and listing them on a 'capture or kill"
directive and bypassing all forms of due process is wrong. The article is at:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-10855869/
I quote from the article about the goals of the lawsuit in this situation
that is brought by the American Civil Liberties Union. I do not agree
with them on much but on the amendments collectively called due process,
I do agree that U S citizens have those rights. Citizens charged with crimes have the Constitutional 'right' to "due process" including the right to face and question their accusers, to defend themselves and state
their side of the story, to present evidence in their case that proves
their situation, to have witnesses testify on their behalf, and to appeals.
These rights are in what is called the bill of rights--amendments to
the US Constitution so read them there. I summarized them.
The quote from that article in BBC about the purpose of the ACLU lawsuit
against the government:
"..but rather to have the CIA "articulate the legal standard under which the government
can target Americans for killing without trial, charge, or conviction".
9:04 AM 8/4/2010
Update at 10:11 after I tried to add my comments to what was apparently was a tracking trick of NBC [I did not know that until they tried to lock down my computer and prevent me from posting my prolife comments to their fake forum that apparently is intended to steal info from private computers. The fake forum to steal your info so avoid it, is at : world-news.polls.newsvine.com on msnbc.com It is clearly a trick. Be wary of wolves in sheep's clothing the Bible says. I am telling you it is not a legitimate site.
And here are the comments that they censored that I am adding here since I document every time a major news station or newspapers censors me for being prolife.
My comments exactly to the article about 34 billionaires giving away half their fortunes are:
I know of this because it was on Charlie Rose. I think IF it is given to good causes, it is a marvelous thing. IF however it is giving to those fake charities that kill tiny humans it is a bad thing and would have the potential to annihilate the human race.

Also, I know that most of the world's major battles were not won with tons of money, but with a few absolutely committed-to-the-cause humans who would never relent under any duress, persecution, or impoverishment. Think of Gandhi's methods of freeing India. Think of the American Revolution won by George Washington with a handful of ragged, desperately poor and hungry men absolutely committed to the cause of liberty for the colonies. The sort of money of 34 billionaires giving to select causes is mind-boggling. I pray it is for good causes and not evil, and that the groups selected to receive that money are not in the killing industries in any way.

Gloria Poole, RN of Missouri. 10:20AM,3-Aug-2010

A Real Game-Changer for Internet

In the Reuter's news this afternoon is a report written by Grant McCool about US Federal Judge Denny Chin of the Southern District of NY, allowing the Baidu case to go forward. That case is Baidu v Register.com and is No 10-444 on the Southern District of NY Court docket. Baidu alleges that register.com allowed an intruder/impersonator to get their confidential information and use it to vandalize the Baidu files and computers. They are as far as I know the first company to be able to sue for failure of a registrar to implement the usual standard of protection of client's information, and secure methods of protecting their clients from cybercrime which I define as breaking into accounts and vandalism [theft] of records and files, and in some cases money and names/identities.

I am glad to read this news. I think it is time for such legal proceedings in the US since dozens if not hundreds of companies have been vandalized, looted, ruined by such tactics by registrars. I am one of those since my 1and1.com accts were hijacked last year in similar ways, and also my Network Solutions were also hijacked this year in the same method as Baidu described in their lawsuit. Whether the same people hijacked my accounts I am not sure, but the same method was utilized, and money was looted from me,and also websites,and intellectual properties [my original paintings, sketches, drawings, and genre photograph, and original poems, essays, articles written by me, painted by me, sketched by me,drawn by me, and photographed by me, were all stolen from me]. And I am certain that 1and1.com and Network Solutions staff helped the cybercriminals steal my accounts.
So I am glad to see that Baidu is bringing a challenge to dishonest registrars on the internet. I will be watching to see what happens in their case. I am praying that they win and that they set a precedence for those who were ruined by cybercriminals breaking into internet accounts to be able to sue at the law and recover monetary damages sufficient enough to restart their companies and regain what they lost.
Gloria Poole; at my home in Missouri; 2:24 PM, 22-July-2010

Liars,Thieves & Reprobates stealing passwords -CAUTION

I have had to reset my password this afternoon after criminals tried to steal my Google acct AGAIN. I wonder often if computers and the internet are viable entities considering that even companies like Microsoft,Apple,Google, AT & T cannot prevent being hacked. I am not an expert programmer by any stretch of imagination but I am not novice either. So I don't know how they think the average citizen could prevent cybercrime or prevent hackers if their team of paid experts cannot. But every time my password is stolen by thieves breaking into/hacking into my computer without authority it makes me mad. Unfortunately, I am reasonably sure that the criminals breaking into all those companies,work for the Pentagon and follow that cyber-hacker Obama's orders. He got into office by breaking into computers and tries to maintain control and suppress speech that opposes him by hacking into/breaking into computers.

He is the problem. But he is not the only cyber-hacker. H Clinton had a team of Hillary's hackers way before he was on the password stealing scene. Unfortunately the cybercriminals way outnumber the good guys it seems to me. The cybercriminals are caught or a few of them are, and then they spend a day or two in prison and then they are at it again. In some cases some of them spent a year or two but did not stop or alter their criminal behaviour and as soon as they were out, they were breaking into computers again.

I put the title for a reason. I also think much of the cyber-hacking by criminals unauthorized on private computers has to do with the concerted effort by those groups the Bible calls reprobate and abominations [and I call perverts] who are trying to take over America. They have a stranglehold on Congress via Barney Frank pervert from Massachusetts and his 'boyfriends' working in his office with enormous power. Until he and those like him are voted out of office, the citizens in this nation who do not accept sodomy and or lesbianism as a evil 'right' have to be very very wary. The Bible names the deeds that that group does in Romans chapter one and it makes the point that their degenerate minds deteriorate into depravity and evil until they are 'worthy of death', [verse 31, ch1 Romans, KJV] .

The best way to fight back against them is vote them out of office,and stop contributing to their causes. Don't buy Cover Girl products that puts ads flamboyantly flaunting perverted women on their sponsored TV and websites. And don't buy any product that puts an ad featuring a known homosexual on it. Those companies only respect $$$-- so take it away from them. They are without GOD or they would not sponsor sin as their product.
Gloria Poole; at my home in Missouri; 3:27 PM; 16th-July-2010