Friday, September 30, 2011

Supreme Ct: just say No to Obama; He's Communist

There are several topics I want to discuss today with this entry. First, the fact that the unconstitutional usurpation of Constitutional authority by Obama in his fake 'reform' of health care payments. It reformed the delivery of health care to make sure that those who are elderly, sick,injured, traumatized don't get any real meaningful medical care; and that those who kill innocents in the womb do get paid from taxpayers' monies. It's a HORRIBLE set of rules and it is directly from the communist manifesto to force those not sick to contribute to a plan that won't pay for any real health care when they are sick UNLESS they happen to be a legislator in Congress. If you doubt that, then recall the events in Tucson, where a federal judge and about 8 other people were gunned down. The only two of the group that received LIFE sustaining treatments were the 2 from Congress: Congresswoman Giffords and her Aide. The others were allowed to die from their wounds. That is the euphemistically named "Obama care program" to save the 'elite' with unlimited medical dollars and write off the average citizens who need health care, and to shift the health care dollars to funneling massive amounts of money into hospitals by setting 'guidelines' that require that all medical doctors to prescribe tests for the healthy [mammagrams, blood tests of prostate glands, scans of bone density, colonoscopy] for those who have no symptoms of those diseases but have assets. While at the same time NOT prescribing antibiotics to those with pneumonia, ear infections, P.I.D., or any other bacterial disease ; and not admitting closed head injuries to any hospital, and not providing any meaningful service to trauma patients who are not willing to sacrifice their body parts for the hospitals to get rich on. {That one is in your favor--those of you with a closed head injury try to avoid the brain killing coma-inducing drugs of the "protocol" to collect body parts to give to others. ]
If you have not figured it out by now, as a Registered Nurse of years in a career [but not at present] I am opposed to "ObamaCare" by any name. It is a gross misrepresentation of health care, is intended to funnel money out of households into lawyers' accts, and into hospitals and courtrooms [trying the newly defined health care criminals] and away from medical doctors and true health care that sustains life. U S Supreme Court, I know you are considering this case. I plead with you for the lives of the innocents in the womb that they might not be appointed to death by "ObamaCare". And for the lives of the injured, traumatized, sick, handicapped, in the womb, tiny children [neonates] that they might not be appointed to destruction by Obama either. And in accordance with Proverbs 31:8, KJV as written " open thy mouth for the dumb in the cause of all such as are appointed to destruction."
And I plead with you to read the U S Constitution 's section 8 duties of Congress again and see that no where does any Congress have authority to force the citizens to buy anything. The duties of Congress are listed in the Sept 10th entry of this blog, fyi. And I plead with you to not allow Obama and his appointed AG to destroy the civil liberties of US citizens or usurp authority belonging to the citizens themselves.
And I also plead with you to rein in Obama who according to the news had 2 American citizens assassinated yesterday who had never been charged with crimes in the US, who never stood trial and who were known to the American public as men who made videos protesting with words the U S. Uphold the U S Constitution PLEASE, and the First Amendment and all rights of U S citizens including protest of government, right to a fair trial when charged with a crime including especially capital crimes, right to question their accusers, right to appeals, etc as defined in the Amendments, and the right to manage their own money including not buying a service they do not want [health insurance that funds assassins of tiny humans in wombs].
U S Supreme Court just say NO loud and clear to Obama.
Gloria Poole; @my apt in Missouri; 12:31pm;30-Sept-2011

Saturday, September 24, 2011

Obama's Atheist Plans for US Coming to Fruition????
w/ quote: ...'couple has been fined by the city of San Juan Capistrano for holding Bible studies and religious gatherings in their home"..."were fined $300 for the religious activities, which the city said violated a municipal code that prohibits "religious, fraternal or " ... [not for profit] organizations in residential neighborhoods without a conditional-use permit," as reported. The Capistrano Dispatch article is located at: Some quotes have brackets trying to prevent their links from copying along w/ quote.
This is awful and another indication of the direction Musim Obama is taking the nation, or trying too. If you study [via online and or written newspapers' reports of] his words and deeds you will realize he does not honor the Commandments of GOD in the Old Testament or the words of Jesus [GODHEAD in flesh] in the New Testament either. He is either atheist or Muslim. There is some reasonable degree of evidence to think he is Mulim: 1) because he was born in a predominately Muslim country in Africa; 2) he was raised in another predominately Muslim country in Indonesia; 3) he has stronger alliances with known to be Muslim nations than with Christian or Jewish nations; 4) he has pushed forward ungodly laws that are his attempt to defy GOD [i.e. his championing homosexuality what GOD called abomination in Leviticus 18:22, KJV, and in Romans ch 1; and abortion which is condemned in Exodus 20:13, and Revelations, KJV]; 5) he has done deeds to diminish Christianity in many ways by putting his cause of removing Christian websites and words from the internet.
Articles on the web :10:30am;24-Sept-2011;
Also, this news:
The Planned Parenthood vs human race fight has shifted to Idaho; w quote:
"Prosecutors said McCormack terminated her own pregnancy using abortion pills she obtained from an online distributor at between 20 and 21 weeks on December 24, 2010. Hearn has said she believed she was getting the pills from a legitimate medical provider." Since the Judge in Idaho cannot be trusted to discern the intent of the law of Idaho, the FDA should prosecute her for buying illegal drugs on the web. {in the US you cannot buy drugs from people off the street or without a pharmacy license or a Registered Pharmacist license/ permit. She violated federal law yet the Judge ruled in her favor??? Does this tell you how selective the Obama administration is in enforcing federal written laws??
If Obama stays in office, the US will be ruined. He is evil personified, and he is as subtle [subtil is spelling in KJV] as a serpent. Vote him out of office. Better yet, impeach him now for violating the US Constitution repeatedly.
Gloria Poole;@my apt in Missouri; 10:53am;24-Sept-2011
Update @ 11:22am ,and what seems at first off topic but isn't and I'll explain why after you read this:
And about Facebook:
a quote from article on today:
"The hours Facebook users put into their profiles and lists and updates is the labor that Facebook then sells to the market researchers and advertisers it serves." and this one: "That's because on Facebook we're not the customers. We are the product." Read entire article please at:
And another article about how the changes to Facebook put every task you do on Facebook in the public realm:
" With every one of these "passive" shares, users are teaching Facebook a little more about themselves.
That's incredibly valuable to advertisers, who can use that data for target marketing.
It's also a potential invasion of privacy, " and ...""Since a one-time click will grant a persistent permission to any app to collect and disclose personal information on your behalf."
This is not off topic at all really. It puts into words the very concept that produced in this nation the false "right to abortion" spun by the US Supreme Court from the words in the 4th Amendment. Now if you read that amendment you will see that US citizens have a right to privacy; it no where mentions abortion.The same government that decided in the infamous and illegal decision named "Roe v Wade" that meant a right to kill tiny defenseless humans in the womb [what abortion is] also has decided to 'date" Mark Zuckerberg for the info his so-called 'users' [ I think a better word might be victims] have that can be used to create massive databases for the federal government just as they are used to create those for BIG INDUSTRY including Planned Parenthood killers-of-innocents. Why do you think Obama went "a-courting" to use a child's song's phrase to Zuckerberg and Bill Gates, and Steve Jobs who all own or control MASSIVE databases of human activity?? And the entire concept of Zuckerberg's that has made him a billionaire is selling the users' content as if it were his own. That would be illegal in most situations since users' words, photos, poems, comments, etc would normally be labeled as "intellectual property" covered by copyright laws. But in the case of Democrat Zuckerberg it is overlooked because otherwise how would he give mega bucks to Obama ?? They are two peas in the same evil pod. Selling humans one way or the other. I bet that Zuckerberg would have made a pact [agreement] with Hitler too to sell the flesh and blood of the Jews for money .

Friday, September 16, 2011

FTC Seeking Input Whether to Change law about Minors

There is an important notice to public today online at:
about minor children being online, with this quote:
"The U.S. Federal Trade Commission is seeking public comments on proposed revisions, including protections regarding geolocation data, to the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Rule (COPPA).
COPPA requires operators of all online services or websites for children under 13 (or those who have knowledge that they are collecting personal info from children under 13) to obtain verifiable consent from parents before collecting, using or disclosing children’s personal information." and this quote:
"The commission also proposes a different definition of “collection” of data, which would allow children to participate in interactive communities without parental consent as long as the operators of those communities “take reasonable measures to delete all or virtually all children’s personal information before it is made public.”
Furthermore, parental notice must be given to parents as a “just-in-time” notice, and not just in a privacy policy. The FTC also proposes additional methods of obtaining parental consent, such as “electronic scans of signed parental consent forms, video-conferencing, and use of government-issued identification checked against a database.”
They are asking for comments from public on how to make web safer for minor children. These are my comments about this:
Remember that the entire point of cybercriminals breaking into accts is to steal information, and that nearly every Fortune 500 company with huge I.T. dept [information technology] and huge computer security depts have been broken into this yr by cybercriminals to get their customers' info [per multiple news reports since Jan]. Last week it was hundreds of thousands of patients' info from a hospital.  In view of that remember that in a unix based system there are NO secrets. A person who knows that computer language-coding well can get any information entered by any method even if it was deleted. [they raid the trash often called a 'cache', and often secretive put there by cookies that were put on computer immediately as browser open the page, for example Facebook does that, and so does Mashable and, and NY Times; and multitudes other companies,including esp many agencies of fed govt inc Pentagon, Dept of Defense, Homeland Security, etc,etc,etc, and then  undelete it to find out what you wrote, what u buy, where you shop, who you talk too, write too, send msgs too, etc]. So if children write anything on any thing they are PROBABLY tracked, and I think they should be for their safety, but the potential for abuse of spying every detail of your lives is great. This is my thinking on the topic of the FTC article asking for public input before changing laws about minor children being allowed to us online services. I suspect that Facebook is behind the push to change the law because there was a big article with photo of Mark Zuckerberg in BBC within past month saying he wants law changed so minors can use Facebook w/o parental consent. He's a jerk from h--- as far as I am concerned.
  So think about all the ramifications of this. If children allowed to use Facebook and or chat rooms [KNOWN to be the lairs of se-xu-al predators looking for kids] for instance after school or from school library where parents are not home or there, then bad people and probably good people [assuming many in fed govt are good] are probably tracking the children in real time, meaning as they write, draw,etc. That puts your children in the 'cross-hairs' of spying forces and that makes me very nervous for them because you don't want bad people to be able to pinpoint your children's every move, and identify them in a crowd [Facebook facial does this already] for perverts to stalk, track around town to a time they catch them alone. It is very dangerous I think. 
Please give your opinions especially if you are a parent to minor children as you would be closer to the subject than I am. My only two "children' are grown daughters but I do have minor grandchildren, and I am very protective of them. And I know that their photos have been stolen right off my cell phone(s) gallery more than once by cybercriminals remote hacking into my phones; and from my 'family albums' in my email more than once. I have possession of my phones at all times and have never given my email passwords or account passwords to anyone. So I know those events happen from first-hand experience. Read the entire article please.
Online today 16-Sept-2011@8:29am via yahoo news.
Also, FYI. I updated my profile info. What was there before I updated it today was from when I added a photo that didn't match one that was known to be me, and there was a 'jet-lag' in uploading it. So after it did upload to the photo of me that you see on this blog, I had to change the words to match. Adding "copyright" to photos sometimes causes the need to verify and I understand that. The photo of me Gloria Poole that you see on this blog today is one I took of myself with a timed sequence on my camera this summer and it is not the best photo of me, but a recent one, and that was my goal, to remove/update the photo of me that was on this blog from 2003. Sorry if there was confusion.
Gloria Poole; @my apt in Missouri;9:57am;16-Sept-2011
Update at 11:04am,same day with this about online shopping:
This link to a article is one of the best expose articles about those so-called "free apps" on iTunes, and maybe other app stores also, that I have ever read. And I read voraciously most days. Here's a quote and please read the entire article as it seems to be a very accurate assessment of reality of iTunes ' apps. Quote:
"So, to sum up, these games are based on the following solid economic theories:
1. Millions of people will download so-called games that provide no challenge other than explaining to your boss why you’re harvesting radishes in the middle of a client meeting." My comment on that is: I have an itunes acct that has allowed persons unknown to me to get the apps I paid for, drained all funds off a prepaid card of mine { I learned my lesson about putting my real bank acct card info online the hard way}; and refused to authorize the app for me after taking the money from my card, but allowing strangers in some remote location to get/use the app I thought was downloading to my computer then to my ipod touch. Those apps that were involved in those events for me were: Beluga, National Geographic, NPR,Heywire, pinger [but I did eventually get control of my pinger app after writing them about what happened]; and a few more of not safe/secure apps but the names are not on tip my tongue. Some of these apps were stolen right off my ipod! And with MY information attached to them.
The article about the 'freemium" apps is a warning that those are tricks to get lots of your money. Read the article./s/ Gloria

Tuesday, September 13, 2011

Added to my Ethnic Paintings; Copyright; updated sites

I have added a different [new to the public, I think] painting entitled "Bolivian Man" to my ethnic series on public display and you may see it at my tumblr blog : Also, I have updated other websites that concern my paintings I paint, my sketches I drew and or painted; my drawings in pen/inks,charcoals,pencils. I paint in all visual mediums including oils, acrylics, watercolors, powdered pastels which have a brand name, inks,gouche,tempera, but do not like "water soluble" oils [since there is no such thing].
Also, FYI, I added the FBI warning label to a blog of mine as a reference that the FBI gets involved when fine art is stolen or the images of it are stolen since those are copyrighted intellectual properties to my site at, and you should look-see the FBI warning there against piracy. The warning is for those who have in the past stolen my content right off blogs, repository sites, emails, US mail,my cell phone(s) "gallery", my online storage of that turned out to be a massive trick, my online Picasa photo albums, my Yahoo Flickr albums,my online cell phone albums since yr 2006 to a few days ago,my 2GB photos that were in my album embedded in what was my email once upon time of gloriapoole at inbox that were stolen from me along with the email gloriapoole at;and numerous emails that I paid for that were stolen from me by criminals who broke into my accts* to steal,plunder,destroy me while stealing my life [they thought],etc; and it is a warning for those who are trying to steal my very name and all of my copyrighted photos of my paintings,sketches,drawings, and of genre photography of flowers, landscapes, sunsets, skies, clouds, alien-spaceships,mountains, art objects, trees, architecture,etc [rated G] and of my blogs, domains, content,poems, essays as Registered Nurse, words on any method,format,medium. I Gloria Poole OWN ALL RIGHTS to everything I create, and have never sold them nor assigned them to anyone, and have never given anyone permission to use my real born with name of Gloria Poole or any variation of it on the web. This is a Copyright notice. Gloria Poole; gloriapoole; gloria0817;g-l-o-r-i-a; G-L-O-R-I-A; gloria-poole;gloria.poole. Missouri; 13-Sept-2011 extending previous copyrights from states of Georgia, Colorado, NY, Nebraska,Virginia, any place I lived for all paintings,sketches,drawings, words,poems,content on websites I own and or create,my original photographs, all orginal content of art, poems, words, essays whether on canvas, digital imagery, word processing, paper [sketches] , masonite, cardboard, graphics program { I did create an entire album of what is known as 'clip-art' with a graphics designer program and it is on the web also]; and on websites,blogs I own,pay for, and or create content on if a free site provided for me via professional courtesy; or a platform that offers free sites to any person; and whatever email address I own that is used by me and not by criminals who stole them, but copyright is not dependent upon my email address(s), and in any known- to- mankind method of creating original visual art or words; and incorporating the warning on my blog at with FBI seal on it. Take heed that you notice because my patience is wearing thin with cybercriminals breaking into my accounts to plunder, and with those who broke into my paid storage off coast of Georgia to steal original paintings of mine years ago. This copyright is on other sites of mine; and it is intended to cover all of my created, original works in any format, whether or not I photograph them, or hire someone to photograph them [which I have never done so far], and whether or not I add them to any publicly viewed online site of any sort. I have never given anyone else permission to add my content to anything online.
Also, I updated these blogs over the past few days: [Gloria's Art] [Children of The Father [GOD, in heaven; meaning I am Christian, believer] [G-L-O-R-I-A] [A New York Minute]. You might particularly like the memorial I put there to commemorate America and it's spirit, and NYC. It also has my inks sketch of "Golden Eagle" on that entry about 9/11.
Also, be aware, that those who tried to annihilate my very life, also tried to annihilate me on the web. I have endured repeated attacks against my online efforts; and those attacks were orchestrated by the prodeath industry of Planned Parenthood consortium of those who kill innocent babies in the womb, and by the sodomy-perverts of the world; and by one of those in particular, who is well-known to law enforcement in Colorado. But they have not won, and I have not quit.
You should also know that my main purpose in having a web presence is to promote,advocate,push everywhere the cause of continuation of human life INCLUDING ending abortion as a so-called "right" since it is a grievous wrong and a heinous crime against GOD and humanity, and ending legalized euthanasia [this generation has propaganda label of "mercy killing' or "assisted suicide' ] but it is genocide, homocide and a sin against GOD. Remember GOD wrote in stone, "thou shalt not kill" and that is recorded in the gospel in Exodus 20:13 and in Deuteronomy. My art began in high school when I took a year long class in mechanical drawing so it precedes my career as Registered Nurse.
Footnote: gloriapoole at was stolen from me. It is not mine for years and I notified of that at the time. Also there is a list somewhere on this blog in previous entries of the MANY emails that were solen FROM me by cybercriminals/criminals over the past 9 years.
Gloria Poole, gloriapoole; 13-Sept-2011;8:26am;@my apt in Missouri

Saturday, September 10, 2011

Public Warning on Health Care & internet Usage & DoE

I read an article in USA Today that said basically that the father of Amy Winehouse [ a singer who died at young age], thinks she died from a seizure. That is possible in some circumstances, but what I want to warn the public about is: that another article said she had Librium, a prescription tranquilizer, and alcohol in her blood stream when she died. The warning is NEVER mix tranquilizers or any mind-altering prescription [those with Rx on them prescribed by MD or P.A. or N.P.] with alcohol. That is often a lethal combination. Of course, if you have read much of my writings over 20 yr's time, you know I am generally opposed to alcohol on principle. It is also a drug, and it is very dangerous especially in some circumstances. The circumstances that could make alcohol lethal are: 1) when someone is not accustomed to it [has no built up over time tolerance to it]; 2) is in very cold climate without sufficient external warmth, 3) has other drugs in their blood stream, 4) has liver disease; 5) has certain other diseases that affect the body's ability to detoxify itself, 6) the obvious one, when a person drinks so much that their blood is part alcohol which causes unconsciousness and death.
So just do not ever mix drugs or take combinations of drugs without consulting a bona-fide, registered Pharmacist to see if dangerous. Medical Doctors, Physicians's assistant's, Nurse Practitioners do not know as much about pharmacology as Pharmacists do. Tranquilizers and alcohol are known to be a lethal combination. Lethal means deadly.
Also another public warning of a different sort, for those who use the internet and email:Very informative and scary article
about doppelganger domains that siphon off emails with typos:
"The e-mails they collected included one that listed the full configuration details for the external Cisco routers of a large IT consulting firm, along with passwords for accessing the devices. Another e-mail going to a company outside the U.S. that manages motorway toll systems provided information for obtaining full VPN access into the system that supports the road tollways. The e-mail included information about the VPN software, usernames, and passwords." +... "Company information wasn't the only data at risk of interception. The researchers were also able to gather a wealth of employee personal data, including credit card statements and information that would help someone access an employee's online bank accounts." +..."Some of the companies whose doppelganger domains have already been taken by entities in China included Cisco, Dell, HP, IBM, Intel, Yahoo and Manpower." ++++
Another quote from article about internet in Germany, about fining sites ' owners that add Facebook "like" buttons to their sites: "Officials in Schleswig-Holstein state took aim with a new initiative last month, when a regional data protection agency announced it would hit website owners who embed Facebook's "Like" button with a 50,000 euro ($70,000) fine. Authorities said the button allows companies to track personal data of Facebook users." That article at:
Also a bit off topic but of concern to me is this info about the US Post office:
about US post office at risk--cannot meet the 5.5 billion dollar payment into the fed treasury. Quotes:
"Yet one of the biggest problems isn't mail flow or labor or other costs. Rather, it's a requirement imposed by Congress five years ago that the post office set aside $55 billion in an account to cover future medical costs for retirees. The idea was to put $5.5 billion a year into the account for 10 years. That's $5.5 billion the post office doesn't have.
No other government agency is required to make such a payment for future medical benefits, so why not drop it for the post office." +
..."The Postal Service is not included in the federal budget, but the Treasury Department account that receives that payment is.
That means that when the post office deposits that money, it counts as income in the federal budget. So, if it doesn't make the payment, the federal budget deficit appears $5.5 billion bigger, something few members of Congress are likely to favor."
And on the topic of the Post office remember it is a duty of Congress as listed in Section 8 of the US Constitution which I am including here for you to read:Section 8of US Constitution with the enumerated duties of the US Congress, from constitution online at:
Section 8.
The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes, duties, imposts and excises, to pay the debts and provide for the common defense and general welfare of the United States; but all duties, imposts and excises shall be uniform throughout the United States;
To borrow money on the credit of the United States;
To regulate commerce with foreign nations, and among the several states, and with the Indian tribes;
To establish a uniform rule of naturalization, and uniform laws on the subject of bankruptcies throughout the United States;
To coin money, regulate the value thereof, and of foreign coin, and fix the standard of weights and measures;
To provide for the punishment of counterfeiting the securities and current coin of the United States;
To establish post offices and post roads;
To promote the progress of science and useful arts, by securing for limited times to authors and inventors the exclusive right to their respective writings and discoveries;
To constitute tribunals inferior to the Supreme Court;
To define and punish piracies and felonies committed on the high seas, and offenses against the law of nations;
To declare war, grant letters of marque and reprisal, and make rules concerning captures on land and water;
To raise and support armies, but no appropriation of money to that use shall be for a longer term than two years;
To provide and maintain a navy;
To make rules for the government and regulation of the land and naval forces;
To provide for calling forth the militia to execute the laws of the union, suppress insurrections and repel invasions;
To provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining, the militia, and for governing such part of them as may be employed in the service of the United States, reserving to the states respectively, the appointment of the officers, and the authority of training the militia according to the discipline prescribed by Congress;
To exercise exclusive legislation in all cases whatsoever, over such District (not exceeding ten miles square) as may, by cession of particular states, and the acceptance of Congress, become the seat of the government of the United States, and to exercise like authority over all places purchased by the consent of the legislature of the state in which the same shall be, for the erection of forts, magazines, arsenals, dockyards, and other needful buildings;--And
To make all laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into execution the foregoing powers, and all other powers vested by this Constitution in the government of the United States, or in any department or officer thereof."
And other significant information for all US citizens are these two quotes, from the book review in NY times today online about the book "That used to be us":
quoting the US federal Dept of Education Secretary :: “Currently about one-fourth of ninth graders fail to graduate high school within four years. Among the O.E.C.D. countries, only Mexico, Spain, Turkey and New Zealand have higher dropout rates than the United States.”...+
"Or this, from the Pentagon via Arne Duncan: “Seventy-five percent of young Americans, between the ages of 17 to 24, are unable to enlist in the military today because they have failed to graduate from high school, have a criminal record or are physically unfit.”

Gloria Poole; @my apt in Missouri; 9:48am;10-Sept-2011

Thursday, September 8, 2011

Dumb & Dumber Idea to throw injured under bus

I read in the BBC news today in the health section that England, Scotland & Wales are going to allow homosexuals to donate blood beginning in November. I have to go on record as saying that is the dumbest idea I have heard in a long time. Serving up trauma patients [those who usually need blood] with a dose of HIV is not only dumb, it is catastrophic! UK countries undo that decision before you ruin many lives, and before those you ruin sue you for putting political agendas before known medical facts. It is a known medical fact that MSM [men who have s-e-x-{hyphenated for reason} with men] are very high risk of contracting AIDS. HIV [human virus] and its result of AIDS is bloodborne--in their blood, so when they donate blood they donate the HIV and or the full blown AIDS also. That is NOT what what those injured need.
And people of those countries start writing in "no blood transfusions"on informed consents for surgery; and striking it out if pre-written on informed consent to protect yourself against contaminated blood, if those countries insist on contaminating their donated blood supply on purpose.
Also, off topic a bit, but a subject that affects all of nation in upcoming election. I have to ask this: Rick Perry of Texas were you purposely trying to make your opponent [Obama] look better than he is when you gave him what seemed to be an endorsement in last evening's debate ? Second question: what were you thinking? Obama is not to be congratulated for ordering an assault on a man who have never been formally accused of any crime in the US, nor allowed to present a defense, nor allowed a trial or to question witnesses etc. All of those are involved in "due process' of law in the Amendments to Constitution. I know that most of America thought Osama bin Ladin was guilty but in the US we as a nation do not try people in the court of public opinion. So I believe that according to the written laws of this United States Obama violated the US Constitution, the public law about declaration of war [no war declared on Pakistan where he was]; and the Amendments of the Constitution about those accused of a crime. He does NOT deserve the respect of the nation because of it. Even if Osama bin Ladin was guilty he should have had due process. The U S has never been the sort of nation that assassinates its enemies.
Gloria Poole,RN; @my apt in Missouri; 8_Sept-2011;8:35am

Friday, September 2, 2011

Explain it to me, please...

I have a serious question for someone in the manners and culture society. How in the world did a woman like Kim Kardashian who according to the news made a s-e-x-p-o-r-n videotape so men everywhere could watch it, get a 4 hr special on a TV program in the US, and how did the news that hyped it so much make peace with her wearing a white wedding gown ? White is supposed to represent purity, and in the US it is usually not worn by second brides and certainly not by p-o-r-n-people. So explain it to me. What happened in the US to the TV stations standards? And I want to state that the Christian cross seemed somewhat out of place in that scenario, [of "blessing" that mockery of Christianity in view of the facts on the web] though I know JESUS had favorable words to say about Mary Magdalene, I don't think the situations are similar.
I am sure some people will think this is mean of me, and it can't be helped BECAUSE children /minors read the news and see the videos and they have to wonder if she represents a chaste, pure woman? She is certainly entitled to wear any color or style she wants and to have her wedding wherever she wants. But I thought from the news story that she is catholic that she could not marry in the church probably for several reasons, but it all seemed a bit risque for standing in front of a christian cross; and on TV for minors to watch. Also, I have to wonder what sort of man wants his wife to display s-e-x-acts with another man for sale on the web?
OK, I know I am old-fashioned, but some events should be sacred, and standing in front of a Christian cross sort of puts the duty of those there to be humble, chaste, pure; I think.
I saw some of the video footage, and the photos, and being Christian, I want the world to know that p-o-r-n-people are not generally rewarded by the Christian faith with oohs and aahs and TV specials.
Gloria Poole; @my apt in Missouri; 4:41pm;2-Sept-2011.
Update and on the topic of Christianity. at 5:37 pm same day and place,same writer :
I just read a very mocking-of-Christianity op-ed piece written by James Moore for CNN about candidates Perry & Romney, and since CNN thinks that is such fun, I want to make public my op-ed piece about atheists in general similar to James Moore.
Atheists seem to believe, listed :
1) humans came from monkeys and probably atheists did;
2) that 2 identical body parts fit together sort of like 2 electrical plugs but no recepticle [why they are having their love affair in the news with perverted people];
3) that atheists never lived in the womb of a woman; and they could be right--maybe they hatched in the "outhouse";
4) that they can endure the eternal torment of hell described as the pit of burning flames forever by the book of Revelation in Bible;
5) that sticking their male member into the poop-contaminated backside of another male somehow equals the heterosexual sex of normal people;
6) that ridiculing about Christians will make them go away;
7) that believing in a power greater than themselves is absurd because they believe they are their own god; and think that whatever they think regardless of how ignorant they are, must be true because some pervert somewhere told them so.
8) that the U S is not worth fighting for ;
9) that medical facts that sodomy is a deadly lifestyle is not believable because they like doing perverted things;
10) that Christians have no civil liberties;
11) that perverts and atheists, a small minority in the US, make the rules;
12) that Christians would not dare sue atheists for religious discrimination because the perverts have Barney Frank on their team;
13) and that perverts [named as abomination, and reprobate by GOD in Leviticus 18:22 and Romans ch 1, KJV] are more fun than Christians because they have all male parties or all female parties and ruin each others' health and lives and live dangerously with specter of AIDS always around them.
Summing up atheists, I see clearly why they are a minority in the US.
Gloria Poole; @my apt in Missouri; 5:53pm;2-Sept-2011