Wednesday, August 25, 2010

Judge Lamberth hold fast to stopping slaughter of innocents.

I am absolutely opposed to the so-called research on human embryoes that were forcefully removed from the womb by assassins and chopped into pieces and then smashed/ground up like hamburger to smear their cells on agar plates. It is cannabalism, it is inhumane and it is disgusting. I am sure that those who kill with premeditation and deliberate intent will go to hell and I say the sooner the better for the human race.
And I am glad, very glad that Judge Lamberth has knowledge of the true laws and I am glad he is bold enough to make the fake scientists retreat and stop the slaughter of innocents. And I am praying that GOD HIMSELF emboldens him and holds him up to withstand the onslaught by the wicked and the ngos that kill for money.
And I think as a Registered Nurse of many years, that if any person would swallow any drug made from killed humans that they deserve hell too.
And here are opinions of other Christians:
",,, the ruling [by Judge Lamberth that embryonic stem cell research violates the public law ] drew praise from the Alliance Defense Fund, a group of Christian attorneys who helped with the lawsuit filed by two researchers against the administration rules.

"The American people should not be forced to pay for experiments — prohibited by federal law — that destroy human life," said Steven H. Aden, the group's senior legal counsel. "The court is simply enforcing an existing law passed by Congress that prevents Americans from paying another penny for needless research on human embryos."

Also, I ask you to research the Nuremberg Code of International law regarding research on humans, that was accepted by all nations [as far as I know] after the trials that brought the killers of the Nazi regime to justice. And ask yourself these questions in regard to those laws:
1) how could a tiny, defenseless human in the womb or removed from it by force [abortions where they get all the human pieces to 'extract' DNA from], give informed consent to be slaughtered?
2) How could a tiny defenseless human in the womb or removed from it by force, do what is necessary to halt destructive 'research' on the self?
3) How could a tiny, defenseless human in the womb or removed from it by force [abortions where they get all the human pieces to 'extract' DNA from], raise their hands against the assassins of abortionists and so-called [but phony] scientists who kill for the millions they get in federal research money?
4) How could a tiny defenseless human in them womb or removed from it by force,[via abortions where they get all the human pieces to 'extract' DNA from] lobby
in Congress to stop the premeditated slaughter by the millions of the class of humans known collectively as embryoes and fetuses?
And then remind yourself it is UP TO YOU to stand in the gap, to make your protest loud and clear, to fight against those who are determined to destroy the human race from off the planet and those who think that animals should inherit the earth and humans be destroyed! IT IS UP TO YOU to make a difference.
Gloria Poole,RN licensed in Colorado but living in Missouri; 7:45AM, 25-Aug-2010; at my aprt in Missouri;
Updated on 5-Sept-2010 at my apt in Missouri to re-add this info:
https://sites.google.com/site/newsforlife/humans-in-womb-photos/
has medical photos of tiny humans in amniotic sacs [bag of waters as it is commonly called.]
Also see:
http://www.sites.google.com/site/lifetv
https://www.sites.google.com/site/wordslife
http://overturn-roe.com
http://real-women-have-babies.com
Update on 8-Sept-2010 at 5:08 PM with the news that the evil Obama administration is
trying to force the destruction of human embryoes by filing an appeal after Judge Lamberth refused to allow funding of destruction of human embryoes. The case info is:
"The case is Sherley v. Sebelius, 09-cv-1575, U.S. District Court,
District of Columbia, and 10-5287,
U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia (Washington)."
The Obama administration filed an appeal to try to force the destruction of
human embryoes in the fake name of research.Obama does not think of himself as President but as a false god apparently. He is a false god because there is only one GOD and it is not him, and THE GOD wrote in stone, "thou shalt not kill' and that is recorded in Exodus 20:13. Remember how stubborn Pharoah
was when the Jews were in Egypt?
Obama has to be defeated.
5:02 PM 9/8/2010

Sunday, August 22, 2010

About the Muslim Entertainment ctr planned for 9/11 lots

I have purposely not written on this topic before because I wanted time to think it through but I have read up on it some and thought on it for days now and here are my thoughts on it [the Park51 Muslim entertainment center 2 blocks from Twin Towers take-down].
1) It is the equivalent of bombing a place and then planting a victory flag over it.
2) It is not about religious freedom since it is not a mosque to pray in but a place to party in.
3) It is not a coincidence at all but a carefully planned manuever to rub the noses of all America in the victory of the muslims who destroyed the twin towers. And it was a victory because the men who destroyed it were not in any way brought to justice and they are considered martyrs [the ones who died]. The nation that those men were from [Saudi Arabia] is still considered essential to America's 'success' since they hold the purse strings to the oil that America wants so much.
And my deciding to post this is directly in response to this quote from the Canada Press today at http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/26762. I
quote:
"Despite the plentiful amount of information developed by independent
researchers, bloggers, and commentators that
has been published about the questionable associations of project front
man ABDUL-RAUF over the last few weeks, he continues to travel to the
Middle East as an emissary of America at the behest of the
Obama/Clinton State Department. Ostensibly, his purpose is to
“discuss Muslim life in America and religious tolerance” with
Islamic leaders in Muslim countries. Despite his questionable
associations, the U.S. State Department is steadfast in their
support of his goodwill tour.
U.S. State Department invoking an unprecedented shroud of secrecy

Not only is the U.S. State Department unwavering in their support
in spite of such controversy, they are invoking an unprecedented
shroud of secrecy over the trip."
Read entire article "Report of Investigation Park 51" written
by Doug Hagmann Saturday, August 21, 2010
in the Canada Press today:8:07 AM 8/22/2010
Anything Obama-Clintons are involved in is evil as their hearts are evil
and they have destroyed millions of innocents in the womb in the US and abroad.
And I am fully convinced that the reason the Chelsea wedding was
so secreted away was because the enemies of America as perceived by
most Americans and as defined by the US Constitution as intending to
destroy the U.S. were at that wedding schmoozing with the Clintons
to undermine America.
Gloria Poole; 8:20AM,22-Aug-2010; at my apt in Missouri

Monday, August 16, 2010

Never get an Olympus digital camera-allows theft ur photos

I was given an Olympus camera as a gift for Christmas of 2008. But I did not know it had a back door to criminals as part of the camera. Every time I transfer my original photos from my camera to my PC, photos are stolen by criminals at a remote location who are not authorized on any thing of mine, and not authorized to log in to my computer from anywhere. Today an entire album was stolen from my PC as I was transferring them from the 'storage' portion of the camera to my PC. This is a public notice/warning that most of the originals are still on my camera and are also on my repository site at http://gloriapoole.com/photography/. So if you try to sell them, you will be caught and prosecuted.
Gloria Poole; at my aprt in Missouri; 8:54PM,16-Aug-2010;
Updated next am after realizing that I should have added more about this:
my sketches I sketch are also on my repository sites
and the main one is http://gloriapoole.com/my-sketches/
and my pen/inks, pencil drawings are on my repository site at:
http://gloriapoole.com/drawings/
and my paintings I paint are on several sites of mine but my main repository site is:
http://gloriapoole.com/paintings/
and on other repository sites and websites, and blogs also with a list of some of them on my main site at http://gloriapoole.com and also on my name site at http://gloriapoole.name.
And my grown daughters {Jennifer and Leigh] and their families' photos are stored in other places also.
And I have the original sketches, drawings and paintings I created, and I have my photos backed up to a physical disc in my possession in secure place. The point is, I could prove that the photos represent my own photographing and my own family and my own originals I create. So stealing them will not help you and it would probably land you in a prison for cybercrime, theft of children's photos, theft of intellectual properties, theft of photos of my 'career' as such as an artist's body of work spanning decades,theft of identities.
And I called the FBI,and submitted a written complaint to them, just so you know. I am not devious.
Gloria Poole,at my aprt in Missouri, 7:13AM, 17-Aug-2010
Update again with more info since the photos involve my flesh and blood daughters [Jennifer and Leigh] and their families and also my photography websites' integrity.
You may see documentation of my photography on my main site at http://gloriapoole.com. And you may see the actual photos at these sites that are specific genre sorted photos:

http://gloriapoole.com/questionable-sky-object-photo
http://gloriapoole.com/sunset-studies
http://gloriapoole.com/Rocky_Mtns
http://gloriapoole.com/storm-studies
http://gloriapoole.com/juxtaposition
http://picasaweb.google.com/gloria0817
http://gloriapoole-RN.com
http://gloriapoole.com/churches
http://gloriapoole.com/flower-photos
http://gloriapoole.com/spaceship-photographed-maybe
http://gloriapoole.com/travel-photos
and I have also added them to some of my spaces blogs including:
http://gloria-poole.spaces.live.com
http://gloria0817.spaces.live.com
http://purple-glo.spaces.live.com
and maybe other sites/blogs also.
This is well-known about me and I began photographing when I worked as a stringer for the St Simons Island Georgia Newspaper.Then I continued it as a hobby, and to paint from the photos but thought the public might enjoy seeing them also. But I own the photographs and my paintings, sketches, drawings, and my images of me and I own the copyrights to them also. It is also well known about me that I paint as an artist in oils, acrylics, watercolors, tempera,goauche, powdered pastels,and create sketches with pen/inks, pencils, charcoals, oil pastels. I have also created a few computer-generated graphics on my computer and they are on another website of mine at: http://gloriapoole.me.uk/clip-art. They are quite different from the paintings, sketches, and drawings that I do by hand, as you will see if you compare the sites.
It is also well-known about me that I am a registered nurse for as many years as I am an artist. Actually I began the art work before nursing because I took mechanical drawing in high school years ago.
This is not about vanity or ego but about protecting the integrity of my name and my created works that belong to me and that I own the copyright of, and that were created by me for me [the photos on my websites/blogs were not ever as any sort of paid work for anyone but belong to me exclusively.] I like sharing my created works but that is not permission to steal them. Copyrighted intellectual properties have legal protection around the world. FYI.
Gloria Poole; at my apt in Missouri; 8:38AM, 17-Aug-2010

Wednesday, August 4, 2010

Thank GOD for good Judge Henry Hudson of VA

Today I read this article written by Betsy McCaughey in the Wall St Journal :
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703545604575407160833226350.html/
about the lawsuit filed by the State of Virginia against the ObamaCare usurpation of authority of the true written law of the U S and that is the Constitution.
I quote from that article:
"Judge Hudson ruled that the court must do what Congress failed to do—apply the Constitution." And again:
"On Monday, U.S. District Judge Henry Hudson got serious. He denied Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius's motion to dismiss a lawsuit brought by the state of Virginia challenging the new health law. His ruling stated that it is far from certain Congress has the authority to compel Americans to buy insurance and penalize those who don't. " [end quote]
This ruling means the case of the state of Virginia will move forward possibly and probably to the Supreme Court, to decide the issue of whether there is any Constitutional authority for Congress to force citizens to buy anything. [There is not --it would require a Constitutional Amendment and that ObamaFakeCare bill did not amend the Constitution and was not ratified by the people themselves which is what is required to amend the Constitution. Read the Constitution!
The Constitution is not similar to that phony bill of Obama-Pelosi-Clinton socialists in the fact that it is about 10 pages long and the fake reform bill [it was intended to reform the type of government the US has from a republic to a socialist nation] is about 2300 pages give or take a few pages [last news report of it]. The provisions of it were not made public until after it was voted on, and there was a whole lot of arm-twisting, deal-making, corruption, bought votes going on to get it to Obama's desk for his signature.
I am so glad there is a US District Court Judge in Virginia that knows the Constitution. What a miracle for the nation. PRAY he has the wisdom of GOD to do what is right for this nation and not what is right for the wicked in power in Congress who were only serving themselves when they wrote that bill and strong-armed it into public law. I pray every lawsuit against the Socialist rewrite of the nation goes forward and that the Constitution prevails and that is protects the citizens and not the dividends from abortuaries and 'investments' into killing innocents of career politicians.
Also the good state of Missouri voted against ObamaCare.
See article at http://www.columbiatribune.com/news/2010/aug/03/ap-voters-reject-key-provision-health-care-law/
I quote from that article:
"Missouri voters on Tuesday overwhelmingly rejected a key provision
of President Barack Obama's health care law.." and also
"Missouri's law prohibits the government from requiring people to have
health insurance or from penalizing them from paying for their own
health care. That would conflict with a federal requirement that
most people have health insurance or face penalties starting in 2014."
To change topic but on the topic of Judges and I think Kagan would be a horrible Judge--ruinous to the nation.
And about Kagan, just vote NO to her. She is bad for the nation for these reasons:
1) she is against the tiniest most defenseless humans in the womb;
2) she wrote the policy that upheld that evil of infanticide euphemistically labeled by her as 'partial birth abortion' killing for a long time and she was the legal defense of that ungodly B Clinton including probably for his sexual harassment case involving Monica Lewinsky. That should have caused him to be removed from office but she wheeled and dealed to try to cover his crimes.
3) She is against the second amendment of the Constitution that allows citizens to own guns and protect themselves from invasion by unauthorized agents of governments invading one's home place and or from criminals breaking into one's home. The NRA also vehemently opposes her for that reason.
4) She is a cohort of Obama aka Berry --enough said about that. His activities speak for his belief systems or lack of.
5) She is in the pocket --the puppet of Planned Parenthood and Center for Reproductive [killing] evil so-called 'rights."
6) Her agenda for the nation is ruinous.
Gloria Poole; at my home in Missouri; 7:22 AM, 3-Aug-2010
Update at 9:05AM after reading more of the news and discovering that there is not anything in the NY Times about the decision by Judge Henry Hudson to allow the challenge to Obama to go forward. It is not a real surprise to me however since the NY Times is very much controlled by The District of Columbia [Washington DC] politics and gerry-mandering ,and election rigging,and vote buying.
Also to add this because it is a very ominous sign of the way the current administration is headed and trying to do that secretly since this is from the BBC News and not from any newspaper in the USA:
There is a particularly troubling bit of news in the BBC today about
whether the US government has the authority to put a US citizen's name
on a list to 'capture or kill' without due process for the person so
accused. It seems the citizen is accused of crimes and I am not excusing that
but there is a process to follow and listing them on a 'capture or kill"
directive and bypassing all forms of due process is wrong. The article is at:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-10855869/
I quote from the article about the goals of the lawsuit in this situation
that is brought by the American Civil Liberties Union. I do not agree
with them on much but on the amendments collectively called due process,
I do agree that U S citizens have those rights. Citizens charged with crimes have the Constitutional 'right' to "due process" including the right to face and question their accusers, to defend themselves and state
their side of the story, to present evidence in their case that proves
their situation, to have witnesses testify on their behalf, and to appeals.
These rights are in what is called the bill of rights--amendments to
the US Constitution so read them there. I summarized them.
The quote from that article in BBC about the purpose of the ACLU lawsuit
against the government:
"..but rather to have the CIA "articulate the legal standard under which the government
can target Americans for killing without trial, charge, or conviction".
9:04 AM 8/4/2010
Update at 10:11 after I tried to add my comments to what was apparently was a tracking trick of NBC [I did not know that until they tried to lock down my computer and prevent me from posting my prolife comments to their fake forum that apparently is intended to steal info from private computers. The fake forum to steal your info so avoid it, is at : world-news.polls.newsvine.com on msnbc.com It is clearly a trick. Be wary of wolves in sheep's clothing the Bible says. I am telling you it is not a legitimate site.
And here are the comments that they censored that I am adding here since I document every time a major news station or newspapers censors me for being prolife.
My comments exactly to the article about 34 billionaires giving away half their fortunes are:
I know of this because it was on Charlie Rose. I think IF it is given to good causes, it is a marvelous thing. IF however it is giving to those fake charities that kill tiny humans it is a bad thing and would have the potential to annihilate the human race.

Also, I know that most of the world's major battles were not won with tons of money, but with a few absolutely committed-to-the-cause humans who would never relent under any duress, persecution, or impoverishment. Think of Gandhi's methods of freeing India. Think of the American Revolution won by George Washington with a handful of ragged, desperately poor and hungry men absolutely committed to the cause of liberty for the colonies. The sort of money of 34 billionaires giving to select causes is mind-boggling. I pray it is for good causes and not evil, and that the groups selected to receive that money are not in the killing industries in any way.

Gloria Poole, RN of Missouri. 10:20AM,3-Aug-2010